Skip to Main Content
Norman Osborn (
osreborn
) wrote
2017
-
02
-
07
03:07 pm
Entry tags:
contact
IC CONTACT.
(555 - 888 - 3010)
"Norman Osborn. If you're calling about a job interview, hang up now and call [ business phone number ]. Otherwise stay on the line and leave a message. I'll get back to you when I can."
beep!
calls | voice mail | text messages | email
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-16 06:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh, I know about that.
Rather, I've heard.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-16 07:07 am (UTC)
(
link
)
And yet you still play coy. Even to me? Even on my birthday?
Hardly magnanimous of you.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-16 08:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
What is it you want me to tell you, Nygma?
People have secret identities for a reason. Not mine to give.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-16 05:21 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Given your lack of outrage over the public event (one observed by not a mere few citizens), I've already deduced that you know the individual.
Know and, perhaps, enabled. But that last bit is more difficult to prove, isn't it?
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-16 10:11 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Almost impossible to prove, I'd say. Even if said individual claimed as much, they could easily be lying.
It hasn't been my title in a long time.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 04:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Which doesn't make you any less possessive. You wouldn't take this so calmly if the variable, if
that
Green Goblin was wholly alien.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 05:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Do you have a suspect?
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 05:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
The culprit would be limited to the pool of people you have impressive control over.
How deep must one wade?
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 05:35 am (UTC)
(
link
)
One wonders.
Why is this so important to you?
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 05:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Because, Norman. Your legacy has meaning to me.
I am, after all, the one who exposed you in this universe.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 06:01 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Meaning to just you, or should I be concerned where this information is going?
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 06:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You're not the only possessive one between the two of us, Norman. You needn't worry.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 06:11 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Just checking. Can't be too careful, you know.
[
Or too paranoid.
]
You're welcome to riddle it out if you like.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 06:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I don't riddle according to your permission, Norman. A truth you must regret, surely.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 06:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
It was an offer. I know how you feel about free answers.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 07:30 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Every Rose has its thorn.
But then we'd be getting a bit Freudian with the phallic symbolism, wouldn't we?
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 08:23 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Only if you squint. It doesn't really matter to me what she does with her accessories.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 09:20 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Are you courting falsehoods intentionally?
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-17 09:48 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You like it, don't you?
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-17 04:33 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I much prefer taunting you about this matter, regardless of your attempts to evade. You're edging back into their game, Norman.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-18 12:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
No. I'm edging them back into mine.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-18 05:34 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Do you ever wonder what your hubris causes for you? Honest query.
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-18 11:56 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Honest or not, that seems like a trick question.
no subject
enigmaestro
2013-11-19 03:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
What sort of question isn't a trick question?
no subject
osreborn
2013-11-20 11:30 am (UTC)
(
link
)
The sort I'd give a straight answer to.
(no subject)
enigmaestro
-
2013-11-22 04:55 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
osreborn
-
2013-11-23 06:57 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
enigmaestro
-
2013-11-28 19:05 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
osreborn
-
2013-11-30 10:16 (UTC)
-
Expand
1253 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
Rather, I've heard.
no subject
Hardly magnanimous of you.
no subject
People have secret identities for a reason. Not mine to give.
no subject
Know and, perhaps, enabled. But that last bit is more difficult to prove, isn't it?
no subject
It hasn't been my title in a long time.
no subject
no subject
no subject
How deep must one wade?
no subject
Why is this so important to you?
no subject
I am, after all, the one who exposed you in this universe.
no subject
no subject
no subject
[ Or too paranoid. ]
You're welcome to riddle it out if you like.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But then we'd be getting a bit Freudian with the phallic symbolism, wouldn't we?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)